State v. Frey
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for attempted burglary in the first degree with a firearm and numerous other offenses. ORS 164.225; ORS 161.405; ORS 161.610. Defendant contends, inter alia, that, under State v. Boots, 308 Or 371, 780 P2d 725 (1989), cert den, 510 US 1013 (1993), the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury, with respect to the attempted burglary charge, that at least 10 jurors must agree on which specific crime defendant intended to commit when attempting to enter the dwelling. Defendant also contends that the trial court erred in imposing upward departure…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. LotchesOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. BootsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Shields v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. SandersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hale v. BellequeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Hale v. BellequeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. MirandaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. DowningCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. PoitraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.