Kohn Display & Woodworking Co. v. Paragon Paint & Varnish Corp.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.
The defendant was defaulted for failure to appear and judgment was rendered two *447weeks later. The defendant’s motions to open judgment were denied, as was the further motion to reargue a motion to open. The defendant has appealed from the judgment.
The finding of facts made by the court is apparently not made from any hearing but from the file and it also includes rulings by other judges subsequent to the rendering of the judgment.
The record reveals that the complaint, returnable the second Tuesday of April, 1971, was filed March 17, 1971. Service was made March 12, 1971, pursuant to § 33-411…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carten v. CartenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Watson v. HowardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- East Side Civic Assn. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Felletter v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Liebeskind v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. RozbickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Carpenter v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Peabody, N.E., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Rybinski v. State Employees' Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- State v. MalkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.