Legal Opinion

State v. . Peterson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 31, 1945PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

We do not deem it necessary to summarize all tbe testimony or to enter into a discussion of its probative force further than to say there was sufficient evidence offered to repel tbe motion to dismiss under G. S., 15-173.

Tbe contention that there is no competent evidence of tbe cause of death is without merit. Tbe deceased was a young man in apparent good health. He received a traumatic injury which crushed his skull and affected the brain tissue. He died almost immediately thereafter. Certainly this warrants the inference that death was caused by the crushed skull and the injured brain…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Speas v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. State v. . SingletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. State v. . DilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. MintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. State v. PhiferSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. CuthrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. State v. BuieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API