Legal Opinion
Lindsey v. Butte
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 29, 1929No. Docket No. 3642PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
The plaintiff was given judgment against all the defendants for the sum of $6,000 as damages for the conversion of an automobile and the further sum of $250 as compensation for time and money expended in pursuit of the automobile. There are two appeals from the judgment; one by the defendant Heilman Commercial Trust and Savings Bank and the other by defendants Butte, Barker, and Pacific Ready-Cut Homes, Inc.
October 19, 1923, the plaintiff and E. L. Butler entered into a conditional sale contract, in the usual form, by the terms of which the former agreed to purchase from the latter a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hoppin v. MunseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Corey v. StruveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Conolley v. PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Pacific Finance & Investment Co. v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- California Cured Fruit Ass'n v. AinsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Booth v. Peoples Finance & Thrift Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Bunnell v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Foster v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1961
- Rathbun v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Roan v. JohnsonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.