California Cured Fruit Ass'n v. Ainsworth
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
HARRISON, J.—
Action in trover for the conversion of ten. tons of prunes, alleged to be of the value of seven hundred dollars.
The plaintiff bases its right of recovery upon a certain contract between it and the defendant Ainsworth, by the terms of which Ainsworth, who was the owner of a tract of land, upon which the prunes were then growing, “ sold and transferred to plaintiff an undivided interest, equal to two per cent, in his interest or ownership in or to said prunes, and agreed to cultivate and care for said prunes, at his own expense, and to cure the same to the satisfaction of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Parish v. . WheelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Burk v. WebbMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- King v. BangsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Benjamin v. StrempleIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
- White v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Goldberg v. ListCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Consolidated Adjustment Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Corey v. StruveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Watson v. Stockton Morris Plan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Camp v. OrtegaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.