Legal Opinion
Klute v. Shinseki
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 12, 2011No. Civil Action 10-1126 (RBW)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
This case arises from claims brought pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12102, 12111-12 (2006), Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (2006), and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794a (2006). 1 Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶ 4. The plaintiff asserts that he was discriminated against by the defendant based on his disabilities, race, and sex. Id. ¶ 1. Currently before the Court is the defendant’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 motion for summary judgment. See…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Coulibaly v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Bonnette v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Ahmed v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Klute v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Kidwell v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.