Legal Opinion
Ahmed v. Napolitano
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 10, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2011-0518PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Hajjar Ahmed and Hossam Ahmed bring this action against Janet Napolitano, acting in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, for violating the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 791, et seq., (2006) (“the RHA”), and the Americans with Disability Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq., (2006) (“the ADA”). Plaintiff Hajjar Ahmed alleges her employer, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, discriminated against her on the basis of her disability and subjected her to reprisal after she filed a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Williams v. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Kungle v. Executive Officers, State Farm InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Beloate v. DejoyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2023
- Cobb v. HarkerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Daniel Dahlman and Julianne Dahlman v. Washington Montessori, Inc., d/b/a Washington Montessori Public Charter School, and Jamie Midgette, individually and in his official capacity as Chairman of the Board of TrusteesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2025
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.