Legal Opinion
Klute v. Shinseki
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 9, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-1126PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
This case arises from claims brought pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794a (2006), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (2006). Second Amended Complaint (“2d Am. Compl.”) ¶ 4. The plaintiff asserts that the defendant discriminated against him based on his disability, race, and sex. Id. ¶ 1. Currently before the Court is the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Defendant’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (“Def.’s Mot.”). For the reasons explained…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ramsey v. MonizDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Pauling v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Brooks v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Smith v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Porter v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.