Pavlich v. Ambrosia Coal & Construction Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Jones,
We aré presented here with cross appeals taken by the Pavlichs (“lessors” and appellants in Appeal 252) «.rid by Ambrosia Coal and Construction Company (“lessee” and appellant in Appeal 260) from a final decree refusing five of the lessors’ causes of action but *212granting their sixth. We shall discuss each appeal separately.
Number 252, March Term, 1970
Subject to a written “lease” which was subsequently revised and partially sublet, the lessors permitted the removal, by the lessee, from their property of all limestone, stripping coal, fire clay, shale and flint clay…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Cannelton Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Masciantonio WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Yuhas v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Consolidated Tile & Slate Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Morgan v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Daset Mining Corp. v. Industrial Fuels Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- United States Gypsum Co. v. Schiavo Bros., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- In Re Chateaugay Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Delaware River Port Authority v. ThornburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.