Legal Opinion
Delaware River Port Authority v. Thornburgh
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 24, 1991No. 2210 C.D. 1979 and 707 C.D. 1982,PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NARICK, Senior Judge.
Before us for disposition is a petition to enforce settlement filed by the Delaware River Port Authority (DRPA). An evidentiary hearing on the petition was scheduled for July 26, 1989. Following oral argument of counsel, this Court took under advisement the issue of whether parol evidence should be admitted in order to interpret the November 26, 1986 agreement between DRPA and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation (DOT), which DRPA contends is ambiguous. Because we have concluded that the agreement is not ambiguous, we shall deny the petition…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Hutchison v. Sunbeam Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Steuart v. McChesneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Daset Mining Corp. v. Industrial Fuels Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Bardwell v. the Willis CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ballinger v. Delaware River Port AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Accurso v. Infra-Red Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Adhi Parasakthi Charitable, Medical, Educational, & Cultural Society of North America v. Township of West PikelandDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Keenan v. Scott Township AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Oakmont Presbyterian Home v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.