Legal Opinion
Yuhas v. Schmidt
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 23, 1969No. Appeals, 300 to 303PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Jones,
William H. Ivens, Jr., a doctor of veterinary medicine, began practicing his profession at 60 Haverford Road, Ardmore, in 1934. John B. Schmidt and Theo dore Y. Yulias, appellant, began working for Dr. Ivens before they bad graduated from veterinary school and continued working as full-time veterinarians after receiving their, degrees.
Near the end of 1958 Dr. Ivens developed a serious heart condition which required him to reduce his work load considerably. At the same time, Drs. Schmidt and Yuhas became interested in acquiring á proprietary interest in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Masciantonio WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Boyd EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Girard Trust Bank v. SweeneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Dunn v. OrloffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Shydlinski v. VogtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Frowen v. BlankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Field v. Golden Triangle Broadcasting, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Chatham Communications, Inc. v. General Press Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Deerfield Commodities, Ltd. v. Nerco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Payne v. KassabSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.