Consolidated Tile & Slate Co. v. Fox
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen,
The plaintiff entered into a written agreement, as a subcontractor, to provide the labor and material for ceramic tile work in an apartment building for which the defendants were the general contractors. This action of assumpsit sought recovery of the balance due under the agreement and an additional sum allegedly due for extra material and labor supplied at the defendants’ request and for which they allegedly agreed to pay beyond the sum stipulated in the contract. The jury found in plaintiff’s favor in the sum of $32,324.50. Following the denial of a motion for a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Herr EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Pittsburgh Steel Co. v. Patterson-Emerson-Comstock, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Wilkes-Barre Township School District v. CorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Wagner v. Graziano Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Dowgiel v. ReidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- General Mills, Inc. v. SnavelySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Frickert v. Deiter Bros. Fuel Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Contractor Utility Sales Co. v. Certain-teed Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Easton Theatres, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Land & Mortgage Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Garner v. GIRARD TRUST BANKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.