Legal Opinion

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Urban Redevelopment Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1994No. 49 W.D. 1992PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

The sui generis issue with which we are presented is whether a mortgagee financial institution or a mortgage guaranty insurance company should be held responsible for the misrepresentations of a mortgagor. Because the mortgage guaranty insurance company, in the absence of a policy provision, may show through custom in the trade that the mortgagee financial institution is responsible for the misrepresentations of a mortgagor, we now affirm.

In 1982, Appellant, the Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh (U.R.A.), and First Federal Savings and Loan Association of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Penn Center House, Inc. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Nicolella v. PalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Fessman EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Edwin J. Schoettle Co. AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Diversified Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Gutteridge v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Sunbeam Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Rauch v. Mike-MayerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. 1726 Cherry Street Partnership v. Bell Atlantic Properties, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API