Resolution Trust Corp. v. Urban Redevelopment Authority
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
The sui generis issue with which we are presented is whether a mortgagee financial institution or a mortgage guaranty insurance company should be held responsible for the misrepresentations of a mortgagor. Because the mortgage guaranty insurance company, in the absence of a policy provision, may show through custom in the trade that the mortgagee financial institution is responsible for the misrepresentations of a mortgagor, we now affirm.
In 1982, Appellant, the Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh (U.R.A.), and First Federal Savings and Loan Association of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Penn Center House, Inc. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Nicolella v. PalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Fessman EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Edwin J. Schoettle Co. AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Diversified Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Gutteridge v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Sunbeam Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Rauch v. Mike-MayerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- 1726 Cherry Street Partnership v. Bell Atlantic Properties, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.