Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Johnson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1973PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTong-Ue, J.

This is a suit for specific performance of an “earnest money receipt” for the sale of land near Astoria. Defendants appeal from a decree by which the trial judge ordered the parties to “perform pursuant to a land sale contract as contemplated by the earnest money receipt,” the terms of such “contract” being attached to that decree.

Defendants contend that: (1) the trial court erred in denying defendants’ motion for a jury trial; (2) the legal description of the land was insufficient; (B) the trial court ignored testimony to the effect that the property was to be surveyed and “legal documents”…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rosenfield v. United States Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Hubbell v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Higgins v. Insurance Company of North AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. CALDWELL ET UX v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1961

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Sealey v. HicksOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Jensen v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. High v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Booras v. UyedaOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. David M. Scott Construction Corp. v. FarrellOregon Supreme Court · 1979

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API