Legal Opinion

Genest v. John Glenn Corporation

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1985No. TC 113,798 CA A23098 SC 29599PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*725LENT, J.

We are first required to ascertain the terms of an option to purchase real property and then to decide whether the holder of the option is entitled to a judgment for specific performance. Both the trial court and the Court of Appeals, Genest v. John Glenn Corporation, 62 Or App 562, 661 P2d 1383 (1983), found that plaintiff had established that the option fixed a purchase price of $425,000 with a limit of 29 percent thereof to be paid in the first year of exercise of the option, and a certain amount paid under the terms of a lease of the property to be credited against the purchase…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Phillips v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Booras v. UyedaOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Van v. FoxOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. McIllmoil v. Frawley Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1923

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Oregon Rsa No. 6, Inc. v. Castle Rock Cellular of Oregon Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1993
  2. Willbanks v. GoodwinOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Povey v. ClowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Miller v. OgdenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. Ochs v. AlbinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API