Legal Opinion

Howard v. Thomas

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1974PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

Plaintiff filed this suit for specific performance of an earnest money receipt in which the defendants agreed to sell a ranch to plaintiff. The trial court entered a decree allowing specific performance subject to certain conditions, and defendants appeal.

The earnest money receipt provided the defendants would sell certain real property to plaintiff for $54,480, with $14,480 as “earnest money and in part payment,” and the balance to be paid at the rate of $10,000 per year at 7 per cent interest, “or if seller desires the annual payment can be less.” The receipt also allowed the sellers the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Phillips v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Berry v. WorthamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
  3. Smith v. VehrsOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Comstock Mfg. Co. v. SchiffmannOregon Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Booras v. UyedaOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Van v. FoxOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Northwest v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. Southworth v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. McDowell Welding & Pipefitting, Inc. v. United States Gypsum Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API