Legal Opinion
Atlantic Richfield Co. v. District Court, Montrose County
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided July 9, 1990No. 89SA423PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rovira
Pursuant to C.A.R. 21, the Atlantic Rich-field Company, Exxon Corporation, and Shell Western E & P, Inc. (oil companies), petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus either ordering the trial court to take further action on the issue of refunds or ordering the trial court to remand the case to the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) for determination of the refund issue arising out of our decision in Colorado-Ute Electric Association, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission, 760 P.2d 627 (Colo.1988), appeal dismissed, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1333, 103 L.Ed.2d 804 (1989). The oil companies also…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Arkadelphia Milling Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Arkadelphia Co. v. St. Louis SW Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Northwestern Fuel Co. v. BrockSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Inland Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Estate of Milstein v. AyersColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Town of Carbondale v. GSS PROPERTIES, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- Francen v. Colo. Dep't of RevenueColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Sugarmill Woods Civic Ass'n v. Florida Water Services Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001