Legal Opinion
Inland Steel Co. v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 30, 1939No. Nos. 227, 228PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
In No. 227, after full hearings the Interstate Commerce Commission, on July 11, 1935, found and reported 1 that the Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad was engaged in the practice of paying an allowance for appellant’s service in spotting-cars in appellant’s plant; 2 that appellant was performing this plant service for its own convenience; that the Railroad was under no legal obligation to spot the cars and therefore the allowance was paid for service-tor which the Railroad was not compensated under line-haul rates; that the allowance was unlawful and afforded appellant a preferential service, not…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Ford Motor Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Mitchell Coal & Coke Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Arkadelphia Milling Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.