Legal Opinion

Arkadelphia Milling Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 3, 1919No. Nos. 92-95PublishedCited by 175 opinions

APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE. UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. The cases are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney

These four cases were consolidated for the purposes of the hearing in the District Court, and have been, treated as consolidated for the purposes of the hearing on appeal. They are so closely related that they may be dealt with in a single opinion.

On July 18, 1908, the two railway companies concerned —the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern, which for brevity may be called the Iron Mountain, and the St. Louis Southwestern, which may be called the Southwestern — brought separate suits in equity in the Circuit Court (now the District Court) of the United States for the Eastern District of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by175 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Chafin v. ChafinSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

170 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API