Legal Opinion · Dissent

Francen v. Colo. Dep't of Revenue

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 2012No. 10CA2382Published

1Dissent

Judge TAUBMAN dissenting.

¶ 47 Because I disagree with the majority that the legality of the initial contact between a driver and the police is not relevant in a civil driver's license revocation proceeding, I respectfully dissent. To the contrary, I would continue to follow Peterson v. Tipton, 833 P.2d 830 (Colo.App.1992), and its progeny, holding that because it is implicit in the statutory scheme, a driver may raise the legality of the initial traffic stop and subsequent arrest at his or her civil driver's license revocation proceeding.

¶ 48 Further, because this is the unusual case in which…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of M.M., a Child, and concerning C.M.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Pooler v. Motor Vehicles DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. LussierSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  4. People v. KruegerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. People v. in the Interest of H.J.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API