Francen v. Colo. Dep't of Revenue
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Judge TAUBMAN dissenting.
¶ 47 Because I disagree with the majority that the legality of the initial contact between a driver and the police is not relevant in a civil driver's license revocation proceeding, I respectfully dissent. To the contrary, I would continue to follow Peterson v. Tipton, 833 P.2d 830 (Colo.App.1992), and its progeny, holding that because it is implicit in the statutory scheme, a driver may raise the legality of the initial traffic stop and subsequent arrest at his or her civil driver's license revocation proceeding.
¶ 48 Further, because this is the unusual case in which…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of M.M., a Child, and concerning C.M.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Pooler v. Motor Vehicles DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. LussierSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- People v. KruegerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- People v. in the Interest of H.J.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.