Legal Opinion

United States v. Morgan

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 15, 1939No. 221PublishedCited by 344 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

On this appeal we are asked to determine the proper disposition to be made of a fund paid into the court below pending a suit instituted in that court to set aside an order of the Secretary of Agriculture reducing scheduled rates for services rendered at the Kansas City stockyards. The fund is made up of the difference between the scheduled rates and those prescribed by the Secretary’s order, which was ultimately set aside by this Court in Morgan v. United States, 304 U. S. 1, without consideration of the merits, for failure of the Secretary to follow the procedure prescribed by the statute.

On…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by344 opinions

  1. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Dietz v. BouldinSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

339 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API