Legal Opinion
Wade v. Rathbun
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 28, 1937No. Civ. A. 3636PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, P. J.
Upon a judgment against defendant in the municipal court an automobile belonging to him was seized on execution, whereupon he claimed the automobile as exempt under the provisions of section 690.24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, alleging that its value was less than $100. The court, after a hearing, made an order declaring that the automobile was not exempt, from which defendant appeals.
The code section above referred to exempts from execution “one motor vehicle of a value not exceeding one hundred dollars”. At the hearing on defendant’s claim it was stipulated that “the wholesale value of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- City of Santa Ana v. HarlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Holmes v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Joint Highway District No. 9 v. Ocean Shore RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Dean v. HawesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Gardenswartz v. Equitable Etc. Soc.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- State v. ANW Seed CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Hornof v. the Kroger Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1966
- Canal-Randolph Anaheim, Inc. v. JE WILKOSKICalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.