Legal Opinion

United States v. Ortiz

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 18, 1966No. 18,595PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

FERGUSON, Judge:

The United States seeks reconsideration of our decision in this case, the original opinion in which may be found at 15 USCMA 505, 36 CMR 3. There, we held the Commanding Officer, 2d Bridge Company, Force Troops, Fleet Marine Force, Atlantic, did not possess the inherent authority under Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 23, 10 USC § 823, to appoint a special court-martial, nor had the Secretary of the Navy authorized him, either specifically or generically, to do so, although we expressly noted we did not doubt the Secretarial authority so to act,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Tehan v. United States ex rel. ShottSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  4. United States v. LucasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951
  5. United States v. OrtizUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. JetteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. Richard E. Brown, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United States of America, Richard E. Brown and David l.taylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. GreenwellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  4. United States v. KohutCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  5. United States v. SurtaskyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API