United States v. Ortiz
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
FERGUSON, Judge:
The United States seeks reconsideration of our decision in this case, the original opinion in which may be found at 15 USCMA 505, 36 CMR 3. There, we held the Commanding Officer, 2d Bridge Company, Force Troops, Fleet Marine Force, Atlantic, did not possess the inherent authority under Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 23, 10 USC § 823, to appoint a special court-martial, nor had the Secretary of the Navy authorized him, either specifically or generically, to do so, although we expressly noted we did not doubt the Secretarial authority so to act,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Tehan v. United States ex rel. ShottSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- United States v. LucasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951
- United States v. OrtizUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. JetteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- Richard E. Brown, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United States of America, Richard E. Brown and David l.taylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- United States v. GreenwellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. KohutCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. SurtaskyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.