Legal Opinion

United States v. Greenwell

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 28, 1970No. 22,646PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Ferguson, Judge:

The basic issue in this case, as in United States v Ortiz, 15 USCMA 505, 36 CMR 3 (1965), rehearing denied, 16 USCMA 127, 36 CMR 283 (1966), is whether the convening authority was authorized to appoint the special court-martial which tried the accused. If not, the proceedings were a nullity. United States v Ortiz, supra.

Authority to convene a special court-martial is specifically delineated in Article 23, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 823,1 the pertinent portions of which provide:

*461“(a) Special courts-martial maybe convened by—(7) the commanding…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. OrtizUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  2. United States v. OrtizUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  3. United States v. SurtaskyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  4. United States v. CharltonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. JetteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. NewcombUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  3. United States v. KohutCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  4. Brown v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. United States v. CunninghamUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API