Legal Opinion

Tehan v. United States ex rel. Shott

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 19, 1966No. 52PublishedCited by 593 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

In 1964 the court held that the Fifth Amendment’s privilege against compulsory self-incrimination “is also protected by the Fourteenth Amendment against abridgment by the States.” Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U. S. 1, 6, 12 L. Ed. 2d 653. In Griffin v. California, decided on April 28,1965, the court held that adverse *82comment by a prosecutor or trial judge upon a defendant’s failure to testify in a state criminal trial violates the federal privilege against compulsory self-incrimination, because such comment “cuts down on the privilege by making its assertion costly.” 380 U. S. 609, 614, 14 L. Ed. 2d…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by593 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966

588 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API