Legal Opinion

Neeley v. Stratton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1915No. Docket No. 35PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Assumpsit by Roy Neeley against Franklin Stratton and John A. Oleson for breach of a contract of hire. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This case was commenced in justice’s court. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff the case was appealed to the circuit court, where it was tried by a jury. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff the case is brought here by writ of error.

The plaintiff claimed he was hired on March 8, 1911, by defendant partnership, to demonstrate a car with a convertible body, which defendants were endeavoring to place on the market. The defense was that a company known as the B-O-S-S Company had been formed and had taken over all the property of the partnership, and that the partnership thereupon…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zucker v. KarpelesMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Fowler v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Crane v. ReederMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Harbaugh v. People ex rel. CicottMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Cousins v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kennard v. PalmerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Corfeld v. Douglas Houghton Hotel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Gilbert v. StickleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Schuetz v. Van OrmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API