Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Stickley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1918No. Docket No. 43PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Kent; Brown, J. Assumpsit by Andrew J. Gilbert against Albert Stickley for breach of a contract of employment. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

This action is brought to recover damages which the plaintiff claims to have sustained by reason of a breach of contract on the part of the defendant. On or about October 12, 1915, the defendant, Albert Stickley, was the controlling owner of the Gogebic Lumber Company, at Pentoga, Michigan. At about that time he entered into an arrangement with one Montambo, who owned a logging equipment and a mill, to begin logging operations on a tract of land owned by the Gogebic Lumber Company. Plaintiff was at that time an office employee of Stickley Brothers Company, in which the defendant, Albert…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zucker v. KarpelesMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Fowler v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Crane v. ReederMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Sherwood v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Cousins v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bennett v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Izzo v. WeissMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Behrendt v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Farr v. HaggertyMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API