Kennard v. Palmer
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
Of course the plaintiff is asking for a reversal of the judgment of the Court of Appeals and an affirmance of that of the trial court. The defendant, on a cross assignment of errors, is asking for final judgment in his favor, for the principal reason that neither the petition nor the evidence discloses wanton or wilful misconduct on the part of the deT fendant at the time of the collision and, in the event final judgment is denied, an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
No motion or demurrer was filed to the petition, but its insufficiency was unsuccessfully challenged at the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Universal Concrete Pipe Co. v. BassettOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Morrow v. Hume, Admx.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
- Peninsular Land Transportation & Manufacturing Co. v. Franklin Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1891
- Reserve Trucking Co. v. FairchildOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Jenkins v. SharpOhio Supreme Court · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hawkins v. IvyOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Tighe v. DiamondOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- Johnson v. EnglishOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
- Ulrich, a Minor v. MassieOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
- Julian v. TornabeneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.