Legal Opinion
Schuetz v. Van Orman
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1915No. Docket No. 84PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Error to Jackson; Parkinson, J. Case by Emilie A. Schuetz, by next friend, against Fred Van Orman and another for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The plaintiff, then 12 years and 3 months old, was employed to work in the laundry department of a hotel conducted by the defendants. While so employed, she was injured, for which injuries this suit was brought. The case was tried before a jury. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $5,500, the case is brought here by writ of error.
The declaration was a very long one, containing two counts. In one of them are the following averments:
“And plaintiff avers that heretofore, to wit, on the 22d day of April, A. D, 1912, the said Emilie Schuetz, an infant, was employed by the said…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Syneszewski v. SchmidtMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Johnson v. City of Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Braasch v. Michigan Stove Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Neeley v. StrattonMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by1 opinion
- Corfeld v. Douglas Houghton Hotel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949