Legal Opinion
Cynthia A. Ebbert v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 4, 2003No. 02-1503PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Cynthia A. Ebbert brought an action against her former employer, Daim-lerChrysler Corp., alleging that Daimler-Chrysler failed to reasonably accommodate her spinal cord injury in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 (2000) et seq. (“ADA”). The District Court granted summary judgment to the defendant on the ground that Ebbert’s complaint was untimely filed. Ebbert v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 192 F.Supp.2d 303 (D.Del.2002). The District Court based its decision on both the lapse of time and finding her…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Commercial Office Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Martin v. Alamo Community College DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Ruehl v. Viacom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Mark Hagans v. Commissioner Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Payan v. Aramark Management Services Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Christine Kerr v. McDonald's CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.