Legal Opinion
Ruehl v. Viacom, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 17, 2007No. 06-1463PublishedCited by 154 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUENTES, Circuit Judge.
This is an interlocutory appeal from the District Court’s denial of Viacom’s summary judgment motion. Viacom seeks to have James Ruehl’s complaint under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., dismissed for failure to timely exhaust administrative remedies before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”). The District Court denied summary judgment after concluding that Ruehl’s failure to exhaust was saved by equitable tolling or, in the alternative, excused by application of the “single filing rule.” For the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Sherry J. Oshiver v. Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & BermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- MEYER, Joseph W., Appellant v. RIEGEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION and James River Corporation of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Grayson v. K Mart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by154 opinions
- Daniel Campbell v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Victor Zavala v. Wal Mart Stores IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Symczyk v. Genesis HealthCare Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Leonard Young, Jr. v. Deputy Superintendent Greene SCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Matthew Faush v. Tuesday MorningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.