Legal Opinion

Mark Hagans v. Commissioner Social Security

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 14, 2012No. 11-2526PublishedCited by 148 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHAGARES, Circuit Judge.

Mark Hagans appeals the cessation of his Social Security disability insurance benefits following a determination by the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) that he was no longer disabled. Hagans argues the District Court erred by reviewing his disability status as of September 1, 2004 — the day on which, according to the SSA, Hagans’s disability ceased. This contention requires us to decide what level of deference, if any, we should afford the SSA’s Acquiescence Ruling interpreting the cessation provision of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 423(f), as…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by148 opinions

  1. S.H. Ex Rel. Durrell v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  2. Raymond Zaborowski v. Commissioner Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
  3. Batchelor Ex Rel. R.B. v. Rose Tree Media School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  4. Burns v. ColvinDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Lippincott v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013

143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API