Legal Opinion
Humane Society of the United States v. Clinton
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 4, 2001No. 99-1360PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge.
The Humane Society of the United States, Humane Society International, and Defenders of Wildlife (collectively “Humane Society”) appeal from a decision of the Court of International Trade. The Court of International Trade denied them *1322request to issue a writ of mandamus directing the President to impose sanctions on Italy for violation of the Driftnet Fishing Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1826-1826g (Supp. IV 1998), and denied their request for an order requiring the Secretary of Commerce to rescind his certification that Italy had terminated large-scale driftnet fishing. The…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- The Humane Society Of The United States v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Motion Systems Corp. v. BushUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Corus Group PLC v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Combat Support AssociatesArmed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2016
- Corus Group PLC v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.