Legal Opinion
Motion Systems Corp. v. Bush
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 3, 2004No. Slip Op. 04-58; Court 03-00146PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANCEU, Judge.
[Summary judgment granted for defendants]
Plaintiff Motion Systems Corporation challenges a decision by the President of the United States to deny import relief to the U.S. industry manufacturing “pedestal actuators,” which are components of electrically-powered vehicles used by persons whose mobility is impaired. Plaintiffs principal argument is that the President exceeded his statutory authority in declining to impose import quotas on pedestal actuators from the People’s Republic of China (“China”) following a recommendation by the United States International Trade…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Nixon v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- National Fisheries Institute, Inc. v. United States Bureau of Customs & Border ProtectionUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Royal United Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Motions Systems Corp. v. BushCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- U.S. Ass'n of Importers of Textiles & Apparel v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Almond Bros. Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.