Legal Opinion

Fiser v. Clayton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 26, 1953No. 4-9718 and 4-9829PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Griffin Smith, Chief Justice.

The two cases — one instituted by A. J. McAmis and the other by Tom Fiser— involve the same primary factor: that is, Does Act 214 of 1943 (which by § 4 denounces violation as a felony) prohibit a state officer, agent, employe, or any employe of a state agency, from rendering compensable services or selling goods, wares, or merchandise to a department of the .state where, in respect of such purchasing department or agency the seller has no interest or connection other than that which might be implied from the fact of membership upon the board or commission that is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corporation v. Gus Blass Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  2. Ritholz v. Arkansas State Board of OptometrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  3. Bennett v. City of HopeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  4. Page v. Highway 10, Water Pipe Line Improvement District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  5. State v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1906

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Emberson v. BuffingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  3. Smith v. FaubusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  4. Parkin Prtg. & Stat. Co. v. Ark. Prtg. & Litho. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  5. Harber v. ShowsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API