State v. International Harvester Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court; Edward, W. Winfield, Judge; Anti-trust acts are enacted in the exercise of the police power of'the State, and are not unconstitutional. 152 Mo. 46; 61 O. St. 547; 104 Term. 715; 19 Tex. 1; 44 S. W. 940. The State may permit foreign corporations to do business in the State on such terms as it sees proper, or it may deny 'them the right altogether. 66 Ark. 466; 8 Wall. 168; 57 Ark. 33; Murfree on Foreign Corporations, 2; Noyes on…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court; Edward, W. Winfield, Judge; Anti-trust acts are enacted in the exercise of the police power of'the State, and are not unconstitutional. 152 Mo. 46; 61 O. St. 547; 104 Term. 715; 19 Tex. 1; 44 S. W. 940. The State may permit foreign corporations to do business in the State on such terms as it sees proper, or it may deny 'them the right altogether. 66 Ark. 466; 8 Wall. 168; 57 Ark. 33; Murfree on Foreign Corporations, 2; Noyes on Intercorporate Relations, § 414. The proceedings under the Anti-Trust Act should be by complaint and civil action to recover a…
1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, J.
This action is against appellee, a foreign corporation doing business in this State, to recover the ¡penalty fqr an alleged violation of the act of January 23, 1905, providing for the punishment of pools, trusts and conspiracies to control prices, in failing to file an answer under oath to the written inquiry required by section 7 of that statute to be propounded to all corporations doing business in the State. The section in question is as follows:
“Section 7. It shall be the'duty of the Secretary of State, on or about the first day of July each year, to address to the president, secretary or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People ex rel. Akin v. Butler Street Foundry & Iron Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. Lancashire Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
- Watkins v. GriffithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
- Casey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
- Little Rock & Ft. Smith Railway Co. v. OppenheimerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fiser v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
- Smith v. FaubusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
- Thompson v. ChadwickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
- Trice v. City of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Hartford Insurance Group v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.