Legal Opinion

Page v. Highway 10, Water Pipe Line Improvement District No. 1

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 9, 1940No. 4-6260PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaeey, J.

This action was instituted by the appellants against Highway 10 Water Pipe Line Improvement District No. 1 and others in the Pulaski chancery court.

Appellants allege in their complaint that on September 30,1940, by order of the Pulaski county court, an improvement district was created pursuant to the provisions of Act 126 of the Acts of 1923. A copy of the order was attached to the complaint. Appellants allege that defendants, Leo H. G-riffin, Edward Q. Keightley, and Yernon Morehart are the commissioners of the district; that the appellants were owners of property located within the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Heinemann v. SweattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  2. Dozier v. RagsdaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  3. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  4. Cherry v. BowmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. Kelley Trust Co. v. Paving Improvement District No. 47Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fiser v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  2. Cherokee Village Homeowners Protective Ass'n v. Cherokee Village Road & Street Improvement District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  3. Kampstra v. Salem Heights Water DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1989
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API