Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Quinn

California Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1948No. L. A. 20218PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Arthur W. Sherman and his wife are seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the assessor of Los Angeles County to assess to them real property being purchased by them under a contract of conditional sale in order that he may claim his tax exemption as a veteran. The appeal from the judgment, entered upon an order sustaining the assessor’s demurrer to the petition without leave to amend, presents for decision a question different from that determined in Eisley v. Mohan, ante, p. 637 [192 P.2d 5], as here the vendor is a private party and not a state agency.

The amended petition alleges that Sherman…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dows v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Springer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Eisley v. MohanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Elliott v. McCombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. People v. SkinnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Lundberg v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. State Board of Equalization v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API