Legal Opinion

State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1985No. L.A. 31937PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*636Opinion

BIRD, C. J.

When a taxing authority accepts partial payment of a tax that it claims is due, does article XIII, section 32 of the California Constitution1 bar the taxpayer from commencing an action for a refund of that payment before the full amount of the disputed tax is paid?

I

Real party in interest, O’Hara & Kendall Aviation, Inc. (O’Hara), is a small aircraft dealer located in California. It holds a seller’s permit as required by Revenue and Taxation Code section 6066.2 Many of its customers are from out of state. Pursuant to sections 6366 and 6421, O’Hara requires that its customers…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Dows v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Springer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Modern Barber Colleges, Inc. v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Robi v. Five Platters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Loeffler v. Target CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Woosley v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Agnew v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS, INC. v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API