Van Loben Sels v. Bunnell
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. H. C. Ross, for C. Bunnell and Elizabeth D. Bunnell, Appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, C.
Appeal rom an order setting aside a sale of land under a foreclosure decree.
The appellants are the defendants C. Bunnell and the Ger-mania Building and Loan Association, and Elizabeth Bunnell, who is not a party to the suit. The defendant Bunnell derived his title from the plaintiff under a deed reserving a lien for certain moneys, part of the consideration, which is the lien foreclosed. The building and loan association is a junior mortgagee. It answered, setting up its mortgage, but not praying for foreclosure. The Beclamation District Ho. 551, a defendant, had a lien for an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In re Estate of JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Beronio v. Ventura County Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Requa v. ReaNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Johnston v. S.F. Savings UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Boggs v. Fowler & HargraveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Callender v. Crossfield Oil SyndicateMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Rodgers v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Sumitomo Bank v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Ratliff v. RatliffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. Sunset Road Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920