Boggs v. Fowler & Hargrave
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Seventh District. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. Plaintiff had judgment. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.
Baldwin, J. and Cope, J. concurring.
This is an action to recover the sum of $5,395, with interest from March, 1859, and arises under the following circumstances. In September, 1857, one Harbin executed a mortgage to the defendants, upon certain premises situated within the county of Napa, to secure the payment of his promissory note to them, with interest, and afterwards, in February, 1858, sold and conveyed the premises to one Bristol. The note not being paid at maturity, the defendants, in July following, instituted proceedings for the foreclosure of the mortgage and sale of the premises,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bank of the United States v. DANIELSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Watson & Polhemus v. SpenceNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Requa v. ReaNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Post v. LeetNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
- Smith v. PainterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1819
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Dobbins v. Economic Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Page v. TurkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Jordan v. MyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Abadie v. LoberoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.