Johnston v. S.F. Savings Union
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hayne, G.
An action to quiet title. In 1859 the property in controversy was the community property of James Johnston, Sen., and Petra Jara, his wife. In that year Johnston was indebted to J. and William M. Morris in the sum of seventeen thousand dollars, secured by mortgage upon the property, and “ which said indebtedness was a debt contracted during the lifetime of said Petra, and after her intermarriage with said James Johnston, Sen., and was a debt of said marital community.” Petra Jara died on April 30, 1861, leaving the three plaintiffs her surviving children. Prior to her death the debt…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Carter v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- McComb v. SpanglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Flandreau v. DowneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Ord v. De La GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Fulton v. HanlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Andre v. MorrowIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Gray v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Fewel v. FewelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- McKay v. LauristonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.