Legal Opinion

Application of Northwestern Bell Tel. Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 14, 1985No. C4-84-1872, C8-84-1888PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

Northwestern Bell filed a rate increase petition on September 29, 1983, with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. The Commission issued its Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order dated July 27, 1984, which (1) voided an agreement transferring Northwestern’s directory operations, (2) adjusted Northwestern’s tax liability so as to compensate for lost income tax credits and (3) required Northwestern to comply with future filing requirements. The Commission’s Order After Reconsideration and Rehearing dated September 26, 1984, stayed portions of its earlier…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
  2. Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. United States v. Western Elec. Co., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
  5. Hazel B. McTighe v. New England Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. US West Communications, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. Minnegasco v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Service CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  5. US West Communications, Inc. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API