Legal Opinion
US West Communications, Inc. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 30, 1999No. CIV. 98-914 ADMAJBPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MONTGOMERY, District Judge.
Plaintiff U.S. West Communications, Inc., (“US West”) brought this action pursuant to the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“the Telecommunications Act” or “the Act”), specifically 47 U.S.C. § 252(e)(6), seeking judicial review of determinations made by the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (“MPUC”). US West has named the individual commissioners of the MPUC as Defendants. For purposes of this order, the individual commissioners and the MPUC, itself, will be referred to collectively as the MPUC.
The above-captioned case is one of eight…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Firstcom, Inc. v. Qwest Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- Coserv Ltd. Liability Corp. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- In Re Qwest's Wholesale Service Quality StandardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- At & T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.