Legal Opinion

Minnegasco v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 13, 1996No. C5-94-1820, C7-94-1821PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

Minnegasco appeals a decision of the court of appeals affirming the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission’s (MPUC) order in In the Matter of the Complaint of the Minnesota Alliance for Fair Competition Against Minnegasco, a Division of Arkla, Inc., No. G-008/C-91-942. At issue in this appeal are those parts of the MPUC’s order: (1) authorizing the MPUC to impute revenue to Min-negasco for the value of Minnegasco’s good will used by an affiliated business1 without compensation to Minnegasco; and (2) allocating the costs associated with responding to gas leaks to Minnegasco…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Humphrey v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. No Power Line, Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. State Ex Rel. McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Application of MinnegascoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. In Re HubbardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. White v. MINN. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCESCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Siewert v. Northern States Power Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  5. In Re Excelsior Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API