Legal Opinion

Perguson v. Tamis

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 24, 1996No. 2 CA-CV 96-0156PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Presiding Judge.

In this medical malpractice case, plaintiffs, surviving parents of decedent Danette Perguson, appeal from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment for defendants. Although this appeal presents close issues about expert witness disclosures and application of the “one expert per issue” presumption of Rule 1(D)(4), Uniform Rules of Practice for Medical Malpractice Cases (Medical Rules), 17B A.R.S., we reverse for the reasons set forth below.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

While undergoing an elective abortion procedure by defendant Robert Tamis, M.D., in February…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  3. Fridena v. EvansArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Allstate Insurance v. O'TooleArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Bryan v. RiddelArizona Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Vega v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  2. Pima County v. Pima County Law Enforcement Merit System CouncilArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Larsen v. DeckerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. Tritschler v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  5. Zimmerman v. ShakmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API