Zimmerman v. Shakman
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRVINE, Judge.
¶ 1 Richard Zimmerman challenges the trial court’s order dismissing this case. In the proceedings below, the trial court granted Robert Shakman’s motion in limine to preclude the introduction of evidence by Zimmerman. Shakman then moved to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that Zimmerman could not prove his case at trial because he could not introduce evidence. The trial court granted the motion.
¶ 2 The issue raised in this appeal is whether the trial court properly barred the introduction of any evidence by the plaintiff for nondisclosure and then dismissed the case…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. WestArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. KingArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Englert v. Carondelet Health NetworkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Choisser v. State Ex Rel. HermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Tilley v. DelciCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Marquez v. OrtegaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Bogard v. CANNON & WENDT ELEC. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Rivers v. SolleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Little v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.