Legal Opinion

Bryan v. Riddel

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1994No. CV-92-0412-PRPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZLAKET, Justice.

I. BACKGROUND

The parties have framed this matter as a straightforward discovery dispute under recently enacted Rule 26.1 of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure. Our review of the record, however, reveals that the case has as much if not more to do with the type of contentious conduct that first prompted this court to adopt the 1992 amendments to Arizona’s civil discovery rules. It is an unfortunate tale of attorneys locked in a bitter struggle and exhibiting little in the way of cooperation or civility, at considerable expense to their clients and the justice system.

At…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Watts v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State Farm Insurance Company v. RobertsArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Jones v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Englert v. Carondelet Health NetworkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  2. Allstate Insurance v. O'TooleArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Zimmerman v. ShakmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. Perguson v. TamisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. SWC Baseline & Crismon Investors, L.L.C. v. Augusta Ranch Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API