Legal Opinion

Paik v. Chung

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1923No. 17125PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

On August 1, 1921, respondent filed a notice of claim of lien in the office of the auditor of Yakima county, upon the entire crop of potatoes and sugar beets on about forty acres of land, therein described. The owner or reputed owner of the crop was stated as Joe Chung, and it was alleged that Chung employed respondent to perform such labor upon an agreement for the payment of $75 per month; that respondent worked upon the crops for a period of five months, commencing March 1, 1921, and ending July 29, 1921; that the amount due respondent for the services so rendered was $375, and that no…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Churchill v. AckermanWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Richards v. RedelsheimerWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Lynch v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Akers v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Hoover v. Chambers, Washington Territory1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. City of La GrandeOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Homann v. HuberWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Central Building Co. v. Keystone Shares Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Thompson v. O'LearyWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Rudy-Patrick Co. v. Dela Costa Farming Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API