Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Mills

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1909No. 7551PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for Spokane county, Poindexter, J., entered February 3, 1908, in favor of the plaintiffs by direction of the court, upon discharging the jury, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, C. J.

— On the 1st day of October, 190-1, the plaintiffs, as parties of the first part, entered into a contract *536whereby they agreed to sell and convey to George H. Brislawn and John A. Walker, as parties of the second part, 720 acres of agricultural land, in Whitman county, for the consideration of $22,000. The only portions of the contract material to the present inquiry are the following:

“And the said party of the second part agrees to pay the said sum of Twenty-two thousand dollars gold coin of the United States of America, as follows, to wit: Sixteen hundred dollars at or before the execution…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dixon v. NiccollsIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Clarke v. CobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Churchill v. AckermanWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Lacy v. WeaverIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Williams v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1856

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Power Mercantile Co. v. Moore Mercantile Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Kester v. AmonMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Federal Land Bank v. McCloudIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Loudon v. CooperWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Fuglede v. Wenatchee District Cooperative Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1925

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API